And no Medhurst either, all reports from last week is he is a month away.
We should win both games.
We should win both games.
Collingwood vs Freo
| Author | Comment | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
 santo |
#81 | |||
|
Posts: 501 28-Jun-2009 13:47:09 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
lones37 |
#82 | |||
|
Posts: 1306 28-Jun-2009 13:57:28 |
So he came back 2 weeks early..still not fully fit but playing through pain. But your were right, for that you deserve a medal.
And we SHOULD win the next 2....we should of also won another 5 flags but didnt. |
|||
|
|
||||
|
santo |
#83 | |||
|
Posts: 502 28-Jun-2009 14:36:19 |
Oh wait... I am dealing with a realist here...
We are a better side than Ess and the Dogs, so hsould win both games as we have done the previouss five weeks. If we beat them, I don't expect any credit from you because your just so realistic. If we lose, lets see you stick the knives in. |
|||
|
|
||||
|
manassas run |
#84 | |||
|
Posts: 73 28-Jun-2009 16:54:58 |
"We're talking about flags now".
Who is talking about winning flags? We've beaten NO ONE. As for having "one of the best back lines, midfields and forward lines" .... well we have no games from now until the finals against the two clearly best teams in the comp. Should be a walk in the park. NOT. Calm down. It could be a mirage. |
|||
|
|
||||
|
lones37 |
#85 | |||
|
Posts: 1308 28-Jun-2009 17:19:39 |
Wtf are you talking about manassa? Top 4 assured, we need to raise the bar and aim for top spot. There is no one we can lose to on the run home according to
the spanker...
And i wont be sticking the knives in if we get done, or ask for glorification. I want a flag, many of them and so do we all. |
|||
|
|
||||
|
santo |
#86 | |||
|
Posts: 503 28-Jun-2009 17:38:24 |
Lones, in case you didn't realize... You're being a fuckwit...
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
lones37 |
#87 | |||
|
Posts: 1309 28-Jun-2009 17:45:55 |
So, let me get this straight.
We dont need to worry about top 4, we are a real flag chance. Even though our ruckman is as as useful as tits on a bull. And if we get done Friday night, we are 7th, with the Bulldogs to play. So which one is it? A flag chance or out of the 8 in 2 weeks? Tell me please Nostradamus.. |
|||
|
|
||||
|
santo |
#88 | |||
|
Posts: 504 28-Jun-2009 17:50:14 |
Time will tell moron.
We've just won five in a row the last by 14 goals without our two best players. I am enjoying the wins as they come, arn't you? If not why? What is wrong with you? Our reserves just lost by 11 goals, that might make you happy surely? |
|||
|
|
||||
|
lones37 |
#89 | |||
|
Posts: 1310 28-Jun-2009 18:05:26 |
Of course im enjoying the wins.....but as soon as we all say we have beat no one, your off telling the world how fucking good we are.
Predicting flag chances and we havent even qualified for the 8, let alone top 4. Whos the moron? So now you agree with me, time will tell. Next 6 games in fact. Hypocrite..look it up. And your right about me being a fuckwit mate, my wife tells me that all the time and shes never wrong. |
|||
|
|
||||
|
whatittakes |
Lones... | #90 | ||
|
Posts: 2579 28-Jun-2009 18:15:26 |
Sometimes it isn't worth the trouble.....
I am with you, it's easy to bash up hack teams. |
|||
|
|
||||
|
santo |
#91 | |||
|
Posts: 505 28-Jun-2009 18:22:55 |
Time will tell sure, but I think we are a real show for a flag this year. Fuck me I didn't know you couldn't make predictions that are favourable to
the team we're supposed to love.
It's ok to right players of before they have even played or the season before it has begun though. You're talking about dropping out of the eight as if it has already happened, despite winning the past five games. We have the side that can pinch a flag this year but guess what that probably won't happen this year. Fuck me if the Hawks can pinch one we sure as hell can... My predictions that I have gotten right makes me no nostradaumus, they are realistic predictions... You actually can be realistic without being a negative moron; that is the point I am trying to make...
Last Edited By: santo 28-Jun-2009 18:28:44.
Edited 2 times.
|
|||
|
|
||||
 Magpie Greg |
#92 | |||
|
Posts: 3596 28-Jun-2009 18:34:17 |
santo wrote:BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH I love our fucking depth. North Ballarat were shitting themselves! Good prediction arsehole. |
|||
|
|
||||
|
lones37 |
#93 | |||
|
Posts: 1311 28-Jun-2009 18:43:40 |
I dont think you get it mate....for the last time, lets see where we qualify, if we do, in the 8...and go from there.
We had the team in 91 to win too, and finished out of the 6 by half a game. |
|||
|
|
||||
|
santo |
#94 | |||
|
Posts: 506 28-Jun-2009 18:48:20 |
Magpie Greg wrote: You know the LSD community is clutching at straws when they hold their hats on the VFL team losing. Well done mate I got one wrong. |
|||
|
|
||||
|
manassas run |
#95 | |||
|
Posts: 74 28-Jun-2009 19:36:44 |
If wild predictions of a flag on the basis of beating no one of real worth (possible exception Bris at GABA) is your thing, fine. Predict away. Who are we to
stop you. But remember we've fucked up from MUCH BETTER positions than this. That's all the realists on the board are saying. You reckon anyone here
didn't enjoy hammering a down and out Dockers mob on their knees in the last q. Course we did. And there was some nice stuff there, too. But you don't
start favourite for the Melbourne Cup after a few country race wins. The day that we do win a fag no one will give a shit about quibbling over who did or
didn't make the most accurate predictions. At the moment though, I just don't know how any informed evaluation can be that optimistic. Yet. Let's
see - in a month the bandwagon may be overflowing ... or empty.
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
lost cause |
#96 | |||
|
Posts: 758 28-Jun-2009 20:11:43 |
by SANTOSSAS reckoning our 2s was a star studded line up so we must be TANKING for early draft picks - oops sorry no draft for the 2s my mistake.
yes we flogged freo but they are a bottom side and had a few of there best players out and lost the PAV early as well but we are playing well against bottom sides and everybody picked us to win them even SHEAHAN - i forgot SANTOSSA who won when we played CATS - SAINTS - SCUM - CROWS and on ANZAC DAY and no excuses we should have won but the fact is the BUMMERS have the 4 points next to there name - wait till we beat some quality then crow. some CFC supporters jump to early and then get there arse kicked which many have endured here thats why 1in 50 a fact. and people get ready in case you forgot SCHOOL HOLIDAYS start on monday so SANTOSSA will have more time to post if he can get away from his parents. |
|||
|
|
||||
|
santo |
#97 | |||
|
Posts: 507 28-Jun-2009 21:09:23 |
There's a few intelligent posters on here, but just how rediculous ^^^^ post was, is why I think LC epitomizes LSD.
Report on 'Nicks' from woodsfor said that Rocca, Sidebottom, Keefe, Rounds and Macaffer didn't play.
Add to that no Pendles and Davis and it is fair to say we had loads of players that fifn't play making the VFL side depleted. However no excuses for the Pies. Freo lost Pavlich the Pies can't be credited at all. Pies had their ten best players injured, injured during the game or suspneded against the Saints. But no excuses. |
|||
|
|
||||
|
Magpie Greg |
#98 | |||
|
Posts: 3597 28-Jun-2009 22:16:43 |
santo wrote: No, I was just pointing out you are an arsehole. |
|||
|
|
||||
|
lost cause |
#99 | |||
|
Posts: 759 28-Jun-2009 22:26:31 |
OH woe is me - poor little SANTOSSA - ring KLEENEX tomorrow and ask them to sponsor you.
keep making your REDICULOUS/RIDICULOUS predictions because your the only one who is always right because we know you told us so. other sides had injuries when we beat them so it cuts both ways. WHEN will you wake up to it that everyone on LSD knows you are a TROLL and your aim is to try and fuck up LSD with all your stupid names and comments but you will not SUCCEED - WE WILL NOT BE BEATEN by a moron and im a newbie and even i can see what is going on. you are as foolish as the names you use. but good luck ha haaaaaaaaaaaaaa. |
|||
|
|
||||
|
santo |
#100 | |||
|
Posts: 508 28-Jun-2009 22:29:19 |
Magpie Greg wrote: Coming from you that is a bit rich isn't it? |
|||
|
|
||||
