Saw the contact and thought it was stupid.
And now hes out.
Would have been very handy this week.
And now hes out.
Would have been very handy this week.
| Author | Comment | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
PungentStench |
JA Gorn |
Lead | ||
|
Saw the contact and thought it was stupid.
And now hes out. Would have been very handy this week. |
||||
|
|
||||
Barhams run |
#1 | |||
|
A break will do his ego the world of good.
|
||||
|
|
||||
lost cause |
#2 | |||
|
couldnt agree more but how did HARRIS not get cited - bloody joke.
|
||||
|
|
||||
carnthepies |
#3 | |||
|
Yeah, Jack was a fucken idiot for doing that.
You sort of liken it to when Hoppa shoved his finger up that guy`s date. Very disappointed in the lad, could have made a difference this Monday.I thought he may have had some semblance of a brain, but he proved me wrong. |
||||
|
|
||||
Wearmouth |
#4 | |||
|
Please someone explain how Schammer's deliberate punch was found to not be striking and he gets off.
And we lose Anthony for a week for that crap. I give up. I have not been to a game this year and by the looks of it I will not attend another. http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/sport/afl/story/0,26576,25470467-19742,00.html |
||||
|
|
||||
Sanabas |
#5 | |||
|
Because the MRP and the tribunal are two separate lotteries. If Anthony went to the tribunal like Schammer did, maybe he gets off too. If Schammer accepts the
MRP's version, like Anthony did, Schammer cops the same penalty as Anthony did.
That said, the entire MRP/tribunal system remains a complete and utter shambles, with zero prospect of it being improved. Decisions are a lottery, we have apparent bias too, just look at what Goodes has got away with over the last couple of years, or the idea that a player who had king hit someone before deserved an extra lenient sentence because he was prepared to plead guilty to king hitting someone again, as if there was any other possible option for him when he fronted the tribunal. |
||||
|
|
||||