| Author | Comment | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
 PungentStench |
#21 | |||
|
Posts: 40 16-Mar-2009 16:43:55 |
Ladder Postion: 4
Leading Goal Kicker: Meds Leading Brownlow Votes: Swan 20 Copeland: Swan Biggest Improver: D. Thomas Biggest Disapointment: S. Cox Biggest Hack to debut: Reed |
|||
|
|
||||
|
Tarzann |
#22 | |||
|
Posts: 8696 24-Mar-2009 19:49:55 |
Ladder Postion: 3
Leading Goal Kicker: C3 Leading Brownlow Votes: Swan 24 Copeland: Pendles Biggest Improver: Anthony Biggest Disapointment: D. Thomas / Reid Biggest Hack to debut: Players to delist / trade end of 2009: Fraser, Presti, Lockyer |
|||
|
|
||||
|
santo |
#23 | |||
|
Posts: 6 2-Apr-2009 14:55:02 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
Lockyer24 |
#24 | |||
|
Posts: 2191 2-Apr-2009 15:39:02 |
4th Anthony Pendlebury Pendlebury Cox Fraser Beams
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
Clokenator |
#25 | |||
|
Posts: 1887 12-May-2009 13:50:56 |
Anyone want to revise their predictions. Lot of optimism pre season.
Can one of the mods sticky this thread? |
|||
|
|
||||
|
Tarzann |
#26 | |||
|
Posts: 8999 12-May-2009 14:27:21 |
just ladder position and goalkicker.
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
DufflecoatSupreme |
#27 | |||
|
Posts: 396 12-May-2009 14:44:20 |
ladder position for sure. i got sucked in by the fact we appeared to have changed our game plan in the pre-season, a favourable draw, and i thought there were
a lot of other teams just as bad as us. got 2 right, one hopelessly wrong.
9-13 for us. |
|||
|
|
||||
|
beheard |
#28 | |||
|
Posts: 787 12-May-2009 15:00:15 LSD Denizen |
Despite being way off premiership pace , we should still make the 8 unless injuries get out of hand.
We dont play the Cats or Saints again , and plenty of teams are very ordinary . There will be some shit sides in the 8 again. Why not us. |
|||
|
|
||||
|
DufflecoatSupreme |
#29 | |||
|
Posts: 398 12-May-2009 16:03:02 |
"There will be some shit sides in the 8 again. Why not us."
too true. although i think you're being kind to us there. i reckon we are in the middle of the mediocrity, placing us about 10th. kind of makes you wish for a top 5 again. |
|||
|
|
||||
|
Sanabas |
#30 | |||
|
Posts: 2916 12-May-2009 16:07:48 Moderator |
Yep. Far too many sides make the finals. But as long as playing more finals = more $ for both clubs and the AFL, returning to a final 5 is something
there's no chance of. If we end up with 18 teams, I wouldn't be at all surprised to see a 10 team finals series.
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
Tarzann |
#31 | |||
|
Posts: 9003 12-May-2009 16:14:44 |
They have mentioned 10 team final series possibility with the current structure - lock it in for when the Western Sydney Kappa Lebo Tigers Pacific Islanders
brigade join.
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
Clokenator |
#32 | |||
|
Posts: 1892 12-May-2009 16:27:16 |
A conference system would have been the way to go, but 18 does not really work. Re-locating 2 teams interstate would have been ideal. Two groups of 8,
play each other twice, cross over and play the other conference once, 22 games in total with a final four in each conf.
|
|||
|
|
||||
 Wearmouth |
#33 | |||
|
Posts: 159 12-May-2009 18:37:48 |
Nup! Extemely confident. |
|||
|
|
||||
|
ev425128 |
#34 | |||
|
Posts: 2980 12-May-2009 22:13:50 Almighty Guinea Pig Emperor |
Still reckon 6th.
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
Barhams run |
#35 | |||
|
Posts: 337 13-May-2009 10:31:26 |
I would rather we finish 14th than just make up the numbers in a money spinning top 8.
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
lost cause |
#36 | |||
|
Posts: 481 13-May-2009 15:08:52 |
15th for me and get some good draft picks we need them - no pain no gain.
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
daics cousin |
#37 | |||
|
Posts: 423 15-May-2009 17:10:28 |
Me thinks we will end up 4th and god help the others if we have the double cahnce and a full list to pick from.
Hey guys theres still away to go yet,never write off the pies. |
|||
|
|
||||
|
Barhams run |
#38 | |||
|
Posts: 342 17-May-2009 10:36:08 |
Heard the Melbourne supporters yesterday being very happy about their close loss.
The theme was their supporters don't want to win too many games for fear of losing draft picks. |
|||
|
|
||||
|
Clokenator |
#39 | |||
|
Posts: 1930 17-May-2009 20:16:09 |
daics cousin wrote: Ha ha surely you jest? |
|||
|
|
||||
|
santo |
#40 | |||
|
Posts: 242 17-May-2009 20:38:47 |
Barhams run wrote: I can understand that. I felt the same way in 05. Melbourne win less than five and they get a proper priority pick in the top five. |
|||
|
|
||||
